Heavy chain and light chain assembly is a method of generating bispecific antibodies based on genetic engineering techniques. Its core idea is to utilize the natural interaction between antibody heavy and light chains by introducing specific mutations into the heavy and light chains so that two different heavy and light chains can be correctly assembled into a bispecific antibody without producing erroneous combinations or hybrids. The advantage of this method is that it can maintain the natural structure and function of the antibodies, while avoiding the instability, heterogeneity and immunogenicity caused by chemical coupling or hybridoma methods. In addition, this method can also regulate the affinity and valency of the bispecific antibodies by changing the interaction strength between the heavy and light chains or between the heavy chains, thereby improving their biological activity and clinical efficacy.
The principle of heavy chain and light chain assembly is to utilize the natural interaction between antibody heavy and light chains, by introducing specific mutations into the heavy and light chains, so that two different heavy and light chains can be correctly assembled into a bispecific antibody, without producing erroneous combinations or hybrids. The interaction between antibody heavy and light chains is mainly determined by two regions: one is the non-covalent bond between the heavy chain constant region (CH1) and the light chain constant region (CL), and the other is the hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interaction between the heavy chain variable region (VH) and the light chain variable region (VL). By introducing specific mutations into these regions, the interaction strength between the heavy and light chains can be changed, thereby achieving the orthogonal assembly of two different heavy and light chains.
The basic steps of heavy chain and light chain assembly are as follows:
The characteristic of heavy chain and light chain assembly is that it can maintain the natural structure and function of the antibodies while avoiding the instability, heterogeneity and immunogenicity caused by chemical coupling or hybridoma methods. In addition, this method can also regulate the affinity and valency of the bispecific antibodies by changing the interaction strength between the heavy and light chains or between the heavy chains, thereby improving their biological activity and clinical efficacy.
Table 1: Comparison of different methods for generating bispecific antibodies
Method | Purity | Stability | Efficiency | Cost | Safety | Immunogenicity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heavy chain and light chain assembly | High | High | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Chemical coupling | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | High |
Hybridoma | Medium | Medium | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Genetic engineering (except heavy chain and light chain assembly) | High | Medium-High | Medium-High | Medium-High | Medium-High | Medium-High |
As can be seen from Table 1, the heavy chain and light chain assembly has obvious advantages in purity, stability, safety and immunogenicity, while it is comparable to other genetic engineering methods in efficiency and cost. Therefore, heavy chain and light chain assembly is a suitable method for producing high-quality bispecific antibodies, especially for those applications that require maintaining the natural structure and function of the antibodies.
References
1. Nisonoff A, et al. Separation of univalent fragments from the bivalent rabbit antibody molecule by reduction of disulfide bonds. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1960;89(1):230-244.
2. Kontermann RE, et al. Bispecific antibodies. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(7):838-847.
3. Spiess C, et al. Alternative molecular formats and therapeutic applications for bispecific antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2015;67(2 Pt A):95-106.
4. Labrijn AF, et al. Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(8):585-608.
5. Wu C, et al. Simultaneous targeting of multiple disease mediators by a dual-variable-domain immunoglobulin. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(11):1290-1297.
6. Lewis SM, et al. Generation of bispecific IgG antibodies by structure-based design of an orthogonal Fab interface. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(2):191-198.
7. Xu Y, et al. Structural basis of assembly of human and murine immunoglobulins probed by ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry and computational modeling. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2014;25(12):2071-2085.
8. Loffler A, et al. A recombinant bispecific single-chain antibody, CD19 x CD3, induces rapid and high lymphoma-directed cytotoxicity by unstimulated T lymphocytes. Blood. 2000;95(6):2098-2103.
9. Merchant AM, et al. An efficient route to human bispecific IgG. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16(7):677-681.
10. Carter PJ. Potent antibody therapeutics by design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(5):343-357.
11. Brinkmann U, et al. The making of bispecific antibodies. MAbs. 2017;9(2):182-212.
12. Wozniak-Knopp G, et al. Introducing antigen-binding sites in structural loops of immunoglobulin constant domains: Fc fragments with engineered HER2/neu-binding sites and antibody properties. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2010;23(4):289-297.
13. Holliger P, et al. Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(9):1126-1136.
14. Spiess C, et al. Bispecific antibodies with natural architecture produced by co-culture of bacteria expressing two distinct half-antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(8):753-758.
Welcome! For price inquiries, we will get back to you as soon as possible.
INQUIRYSERVICES
PRODUCTS
PLATFORMS