In general, VHHs bind their targets with highly specific selectivity, which is a prerequisite for their use in targeted therapy. However, due to the sequence similarity of some proteins, VHH against specific targets may have poor specificity or even cross-react
to other unwanted proteins with high homology. A functional candidate may have to be abandoned when it cannot meet the required specificity for use in intended applications.
Recent advances in the sequence analysis and computer modeling of VHH fragments have created opportunities to solve this problem. Taking advantage of deep understanding of antibody repertoire and in silico modeling, Creative Biolabs has explored
novel solutions through rationally designed engineering processes to achieve the improvement of binding specificity or elimination of unwanted cross-reactions. Starting with the in silico sequencing of the VHH of interest, its target, and
the unwanted crossed protein(s), our scientists can investigate the three-dimensional binding structure and design VHH candidates to obtain optimized specificity against the desired targets without cross-reaction. This approach is particularly desirable
for therapeutically promising VHHs that suffer from insufficient specificity toward target antigen or unwanted cross-reactivity, which avoids many of the side effects associated with off-target perturbations.
The scientific study describes a cutting-edge methodology that uses yeast surface display (YSD), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) to quickly identify de novo humanized single domain antibodies
(sdAbs) with optimized VHH specificity and commendable early-stage development profiles. It shows how NGS can analyze large sequence spaces and how AI/ML can be used to design new sequences with better potency or developability. The ability of long
short-term memory (LSTM) networks, a subset of recurrent neural networks, to capture intricate correlations between amino acids that dictate the structure and function of proteins is especially noteworthy. The high-affinity binding and favorable biophysical
characteristics of the discovered VHHs are validated experimentally. Accurate predictions in silico are crucial for efficient sequence selection and enhanced developability profiles, thus supporting the use of AI/ML for specificity optimization.
By predicting which sequences are less likely to aggregate, researchers can prioritize candidates that are more likely to maintain their structural integrity and specificity in biological systems. Besides, understanding and optimizing the biophysical
properties, such as hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity, contribute to the overall developability of an antibody, affecting its manufacturability, stability, and pharmacokinetics.
1. Why is the specificity of VHH antibodies critical in research and therapeutic applications?
Specificity is vital because it determines the ability of a VHH to bind exclusively to its target antigen without cross-reacting with other molecules. High specificity ensures accurate detection, quantification, and targeted treatment of diseases, thereby
reducing off-target effects and false positives in research.
2. How does the natural diversity of camelid VHH repertoires affect specificity optimization?
The natural diversity of camelid VHH repertoires generates a wide range of distinct binding locations and frameworks. This diversity enables the selection of VHHs with high specificity and affinity for different antigens, which may then be fine-tuned
using techniques such as phage display and directed evolution.
3. What role do complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) play in the specificity of VHHs?
CDRs are hypervariable sections of the VHH that interact directly with the antigen, determining the specificity and affinity of antibody binding. Optimization frequently focuses on the CDRs modifications to improve binding characteristics while retaining
or increasing specificity.
4. Can you explain the importance of structural stability in VHH specificity optimization?
Structural stability is critical because it guarantees that the VHH retains its conformation and binding activity under a variety of circumstances. Enhanced stability helps to improve binding specificity by preserving the precise conformation required
for specific antigen engagement, even under demanding conditions like high temperatures or fluctuating pH levels.
5. What are some challenges in optimizing VHH specificity, and how can they be addressed?
There are several challenges in VHH specificity optimization, including cross-reactivity, poor affinity, and structural constraints. The unwanted binding to non-target molecules may occur as cross-reactivity, but this can be solved by improving the selection
procedure to eliminate non-specific binders. Poor affinity is often increased via affinity maturation procedures. Due to some structural constraints, it is difficult to modify the VHH without disrupting its general structure and normal functions.
However, this obstacle can be handled with the help of advanced bioinformatics and structural biology technologies.