Classical Cytogenetic Techniques
Cytogenetic techniques are techniques that use microscopy and staining methods to observe and analyze chromosomes, which are an important branch of genetics and cell biology. The history of cytogenetic techniques can be traced back to 1842, when Swiss botanist Karl Nägeli first discovered chromosomes in pollen. In the early 20th century, with the development of genetics, people realized that chromosomes are the carriers of genetic material and also one of the causes of genetic variation and disease. Subsequently, people developed various chromosome banding analysis techniques, such as C-band, G-band, Q-band, etc., as well as molecular cytogenetic techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), making the study of chromosome structure and function more in-depth and accurate.
Cytogenetic techniques play an important role and value in the diagnosis of human genetic diseases. By preparing and analyzing chromosomes from peripheral blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, amniotic fluid, and other samples of patients or fetuses, various types of chromosomal abnormalities can be detected, such as numerical abnormalities, structural abnormalities, microdeletions, microduplications, etc., thus providing a basis for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Cytogenetic techniques can also be used to screen high-risk populations or families for carriers or susceptibles, as well as to assess reproductive risk or incidence.
Specialized Staining Techniques
In cytogenetic techniques, chromosome staining is an important step, which can make chromosomes show different banding patterns under the microscope, thus facilitating the identification and analysis of chromosome number, structure, and function. There are various types of chromosome-staining techniques that selectively or differentially stain different regions or components of chromosomes, showing the characteristics of chromosomes. This section will introduce several commonly used chromosome-staining techniques, including conventional staining techniques, molecular cytogenetic techniques, and other staining techniques.
Conventional staining techniques mainly include G-band, Q-band, C-band, etc., which use Giemsa, quinacrine, or other dyes to stain chromosomes that have been treated with enzymes or heat, showing specific dark bands and light bands on each chromosome. These techniques can be used to identify each human chromosome and analyze its numerical or structural abnormalities, as well as locate centromeres and Yq heterochromatin. G-band is the most commonly used staining technique in clinical cytogenetics because it can produce permanent banding patterns, making all human chromosomes and numerical or structural abnormalities accurately identified and described. The Q-band-bandpposite the G-band; dark bands indicate euchromatic regions, and light bands indicate heterochromatic regions. Q-band can be used to identify each human chromosome and has high sensitivity for the fluorescent bright spot (Yqh+) on the Y chromosome. The C-band-bandbe used to analyze normal and abnormal chromosomal structural variations and locate centromeres and Yq heterochromatin.
Molecular cytogenetic techniques mainly include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), etc., which use fluorescently labeled nucleic acid probes to hybridize with target DNA sequences and emit signals, showing the location and number of specific genes or sequences on each chromosome. These techniques can be used to detect microdeletions, microduplications, translocations, inversions, amplifications, and other chromosomal abnormalities that are difficult to detect by conventional cytogenetic techniques. FISH is a highly sensitive and specific technique that can hybridize on interphase or metaphase karyotypes and use single or multiple probes to simultaneously detect multiple target sequences. CGH is a technique that compares the relative copy number differences of two DNA samples (the test sample and the control sample) at the whole genome level, which can detect unknown numerical abnormalities without the need for parental karyotype information.
Other staining techniques mainly include Distamycin-A/DAPI, AgNOR, etc., which use different dyes to stain untreated or enzyme-treated chromosomes with fluorescence or non-fluorescence, showing heterochromatic regions or nucleolar organizing regions on each chromosome. These techniques can be used to analyze normal and abnormal chromosomal structural variations and assess nucleolar activity. Distamycin-A/DAPI is a fluorescent staining technique that can show heterochromatic regions on chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and Y. AgNOR is a silver staining technique that can show nucleolar organizing regions on chromosomes, which are regions rich in ribosomal genes. AgNOR can be used to study double satellite chromosomes, chromosomal polymorphisms, and structural abnormalities involving satellite regions.
Conclusion
Cytogenetic techniques are powerful tools for studying the structure and function of chromosomes and their relationship to human diseases. By using different staining methods, cytogenetic techniques can reveal various types of chromosomal abnormalities, such as numerical abnormalities, structural abnormalities, microdeletions, microduplications, translocations, inversions, amplifications, and so on. These abnormalities can cause genetic diseases, congenital malformations, infertility, miscarriage, cancer, and other disorders. Therefore, cytogenetic techniques can provide valuable information for the clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of human diseases. However, cytogenetic techniques also have some limitations and challenges, which require further development and integration with other genomic techniques.
References
- Bernheim A. Cytogenomics: a new name for an old discipline. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999;86(1):1-2.
- Campos-Galindo I. Cytogenetics techniques. In: Human Reproductive Genetics: Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications. Elsevier; 2020. p. 33-48.
- Chial H. Cytogenetic methods and disease: Flow cytometry, CGH, and FISH. Nature Education. 2008;1(1):76.
- Lejeune J, et al. Study of somatic chromosomes from 9 mongoloid children. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1959;248(11):1721-2.
- Liehr T. Molecular cytogenetics in the era of chromosomics and cytogenomic approaches. Front Genet. 2021;12:720507.
- McGowan-Jordan J, et al. ISCN 2016: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2016). Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2016.
- Siva N, et al. Cytogenomics of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(4):999-1017.
- Speicher MR, et al. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(10):782-92.
- Trask BJ. Human cytogenetics: 46 chromosomes, 46 years and counting. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(10):769-78.
